Comments on: The Web 2.0 Cliche http://webrevolutionary.com/the-web-20-cliche/ Fantastic Wordress Themes & Website Templates Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:51:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: ldb http://webrevolutionary.com/the-web-20-cliche/comment-page-1/#comment-6798 ldb Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:54:32 +0000 http://webrevolutionary.com/wordpress/the-web-20-cliche/#comment-6798 Something else I associate (visually) with Web 2.0...the "slanting" of template design samples on a page....you know, a lot of people do it with WordPress theme designs,..is there an actual "official name" for this? Anyone? Something else I associate (visually) with Web 2.0…the “slanting” of template design samples on a page….you know, a lot of people do it with WordPress theme designs,..is there an actual “official name” for this? Anyone?

]]> By: pancho http://webrevolutionary.com/the-web-20-cliche/comment-page-1/#comment-3338 pancho Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:28:04 +0000 http://webrevolutionary.com/wordpress/the-web-20-cliche/#comment-3338 i remember when i've write talking about the same thing that you in my country. Everyone said that i'm crazy. I hate that fucking cliches...Smashing magazine is a nice "design cliche's fountain" i remember when i’ve write talking about the same thing that you in my country. Everyone said that i’m crazy.

I hate that fucking cliches…Smashing magazine is a nice “design cliche’s fountain”

]]> By: The Intrwb 2.0 Show! http://webrevolutionary.com/the-web-20-cliche/comment-page-1/#comment-286 The Intrwb 2.0 Show! Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:12:49 +0000 http://webrevolutionary.com/wordpress/the-web-20-cliche/#comment-286 [...] Feed My App iStalkr Map of Social Networking Kyte.tv Operator11 Dexly Yelp Fleck Horrible Marketing The Web 2.0 Cliche WishRadar Creation on the [...] [...] Feed My App iStalkr Map of Social Networking Kyte.tv Operator11 Dexly Yelp Fleck Horrible Marketing The Web 2.0 Cliche WishRadar Creation on the [...]

]]> By: Paul Littlebury http://webrevolutionary.com/the-web-20-cliche/comment-page-1/#comment-277 Paul Littlebury Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:25:38 +0000 http://webrevolutionary.com/wordpress/the-web-20-cliche/#comment-277 web 2.0 certainly has started a few design trends, but has contributed to confusion about what web 2.0 is. And what it is, is technology platforms. What it looks like at the front is neither here nor there, for web 2.0. What is relevant is that its a step closer to the semantic web. Great article, and I am sure it is articulated a lot of people's frustration with the fact web 2.0 has become a fashion. The social networking events I have been too contained an alarming number of vacuous beautiful people. But I am assuming the semantic web really wasnt a concern for them .... web 2.0 certainly has started a few design trends, but has contributed to confusion about what web 2.0 is. And what it is, is technology platforms. What it looks like at the front is neither here nor there, for web 2.0. What is relevant is that its a step closer to the semantic web. Great article, and I am sure it is articulated a lot of people’s frustration with the fact web 2.0 has become a fashion. The social networking events I have been too contained an alarming number of vacuous beautiful people. But I am assuming the semantic web really wasnt a concern for them ….

]]> By: MaRmAR http://webrevolutionary.com/the-web-20-cliche/comment-page-1/#comment-239 MaRmAR Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:20:17 +0000 http://webrevolutionary.com/wordpress/the-web-20-cliche/#comment-239 You're right! I also hate that pseudo-webdesigns which came out in last few months. Every 2.0-site is just the same shit as the one before it. You’re right! I also hate that pseudo-webdesigns which came out in last few months. Every 2.0-site is just the same shit as the one before it.

]]> By: Sliker_Hawk http://webrevolutionary.com/the-web-20-cliche/comment-page-1/#comment-173 Sliker_Hawk Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:21:47 +0000 http://webrevolutionary.com/wordpress/the-web-20-cliche/#comment-173 "maybe adding the use of FAMFAMFAM silk icons web 2.0 as well." - I agree. They're good but seriously over-used. People who call themselves designers in particular should make their own icons. “maybe adding the use of FAMFAMFAM silk icons web 2.0 as well.” – I agree. They’re good but seriously over-used. People who call themselves designers in particular should make their own icons.

]]> By: Harry http://webrevolutionary.com/the-web-20-cliche/comment-page-1/#comment-137 Harry Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:48:58 +0000 http://webrevolutionary.com/wordpress/the-web-20-cliche/#comment-137 Jim is off base quite a bit. Web 2.0 has nothing to do with design or icons or colors. It refers to a perceived second generation of Web-based communities and hosted services such as social networking sites, wikis and folksonomies that facilitate collaboration and sharing between users. Here are some examples of Web 2.0: blogging, MySpace, wikis, participation (and web communities), Flickr, web services (and mash-ups), AJAX, Wikipedia, tagging ("folksonomy"), RSS feeds (syndication), BitTorrent, Napster, Google AdSense, search engine optimization, cost per click, etc. Jim is off base quite a bit. Web 2.0 has nothing to do with design or icons or colors. It refers to a perceived second generation of Web-based communities and hosted services such as social networking sites, wikis and folksonomies that facilitate collaboration and sharing between users. Here are some examples of Web 2.0: blogging, MySpace, wikis, participation (and web communities), Flickr, web services (and mash-ups), AJAX, Wikipedia, tagging (“folksonomy”), RSS feeds (syndication), BitTorrent, Napster, Google AdSense, search engine optimization, cost per click, etc.

]]> By: allan branch http://webrevolutionary.com/the-web-20-cliche/comment-page-1/#comment-119 allan branch Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:40:26 +0000 http://webrevolutionary.com/wordpress/the-web-20-cliche/#comment-119 maybe adding the use of FAMFAMFAM silk icons web 2.0 as well. ;) maybe adding the use of FAMFAMFAM silk icons web 2.0 as well. ;)

]]>