<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Flock?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/</link>
	<description>Fantastic Wordress Themes &#38; Website Templates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-21560</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/#comment-21560</guid>
		<description>August 2008
A couple months after installing Flock, and about a year after Firefox, they both have become rather unstable.  Lots of problems with history and favorites/bookmarks.  Flock died completely on me today and will not let me open it now at all.  So it is back to Firefox which at least has a bigger screen than Safari, if a little more annoying in the way it makes up addresses for bookmarks sometimes and sticks them in for others.  Poor Flock, though -- beautiful screen, but it just won&#039;t come back.  humaniores@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>August 2008<br />
A couple months after installing Flock, and about a year after Firefox, they both have become rather unstable.  Lots of problems with history and favorites/bookmarks.  Flock died completely on me today and will not let me open it now at all.  So it is back to Firefox which at least has a bigger screen than Safari, if a little more annoying in the way it makes up addresses for bookmarks sometimes and sticks them in for others.  Poor Flock, though &#8212; beautiful screen, but it just won&#8217;t come back.  <a href="mailto:humaniores@gmail.com">humaniores@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-4984</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/#comment-4984</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like Flock, althrough it is Firefox based, i am running Firefox 3 Beta 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like Flock, althrough it is Firefox based, i am running Firefox 3 Beta 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Flock-ed Up Redesign</title>
		<link>http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>A Flock-ed Up Redesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>[...] looks like Matt of WebRev is more than upset with the recent redesign of the Flock homepage, and with good reason: it&#8217;s ugly as hell, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looks like Matt of WebRev is more than upset with the recent redesign of the Flock homepage, and with good reason: it&#8217;s ugly as hell, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Clapp</title>
		<link>http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Clapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>And I thought I was just crazy. I just couldn&#039;t figure out why they thought they needed a new site. The old one was excellent. Why change it? If I were them, I would ask Bryan to just extend the old design.

As far as the browser, I like the concept but it going to take a while to get it right. Each time I install it, I uninstall it about 10 minutes later. I do hope the project is successful. It just doesn&#039;t seem to be for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I thought I was just crazy. I just couldn&#8217;t figure out why they thought they needed a new site. The old one was excellent. Why change it? If I were them, I would ask Bryan to just extend the old design.</p>
<p>As far as the browser, I like the concept but it going to take a while to get it right. Each time I install it, I uninstall it about 10 minutes later. I do hope the project is successful. It just doesn&#8217;t seem to be for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jem</title>
		<link>http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 07:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>The screenshot doesn&#039;t look so bad, just incredibly cheesy (but then I find anything using random stock models usually is). 

Good to know they&#039;re listening though (re: comment from Evan)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The screenshot doesn&#8217;t look so bad, just incredibly cheesy (but then I find anything using random stock models usually is). </p>
<p>Good to know they&#8217;re listening though (re: comment from Evan)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tayfun</title>
		<link>http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Tayfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>What a piece of shit!!

It looks like the result AOL sodomising istockphoto with a bad jpeg compressor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a piece of shit!!</p>
<p>It looks like the result AOL sodomising istockphoto with a bad jpeg compressor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Radsby</title>
		<link>http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Radsby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe that Flock actually did this. Do you know any browser site that have flash in it? I truly loved the previous version.

The only goodlooking browsersite left is Firefox...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that Flock actually did this. Do you know any browser site that have flash in it? I truly loved the previous version.</p>
<p>The only goodlooking browsersite left is Firefox&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webrevolutionary.com/what-the-flock/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>Hey Matt,

Sorry to hear you don&#039;t like the new Flock.com.  We love feedback on both the browser and the website, so if you have any specific qualms you&#039;d like to see addressed, shoot them to my address below and we will take them into consideration as we continue to develop our website.  Development is always a complicated process, and feedback from folks outside of the company is always super helpful.

@Matthew: We&#039;ve made significant strides in browser stability for Flock 0.9, and we are based off of the Firefox 2.0 architecture.  I think you&#039;ll find the experience much better than older versions, if you give it a try.

Thanks to both of you for the honest feedback!

Evan Hamilton
Flock Community Ambassador
evan at flock dot com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matt,</p>
<p>Sorry to hear you don&#8217;t like the new Flock.com.  We love feedback on both the browser and the website, so if you have any specific qualms you&#8217;d like to see addressed, shoot them to my address below and we will take them into consideration as we continue to develop our website.  Development is always a complicated process, and feedback from folks outside of the company is always super helpful.</p>
<p>@Matthew: We&#8217;ve made significant strides in browser stability for Flock 0.9, and we are based off of the Firefox 2.0 architecture.  I think you&#8217;ll find the experience much better than older versions, if you give it a try.</p>
<p>Thanks to both of you for the honest feedback!</p>
<p>Evan Hamilton<br />
Flock Community Ambassador<br />
evan at flock dot com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
