• Index
  • Archives
  • RSS Feed
  • WP Themes
  • Contact
  • Recent Posts

    • Visualizing Magnetic Fields. C...
      Posted Wednesday June 4th, 2008
    • Use Safari’s Activity Wi...
      Posted Friday May 30th, 2008
    • Peggle Is Very Addictive
      Posted Thursday May 29th, 2008
    • Mac App Idea: Finder Bar Twitt...
      Posted Tuesday May 27th, 2008
    • FWA Theater
      Posted Tuesday May 27th, 2008
  • Browse Posts

  • Links

    • seo
    • Affordable Web Hosting
    • Website Templates
    • Load Cells
    • MySpace Layouts
    • Envelope Seals
    • evden eve nakliyat
    • search engine optimisation
  • Site Sponsors

    • Megastar Media
    • Site5 Hosting

WebRevolutionary

Single Post

What the Flock?!

Posted Thursday July 12th, 2007 · See Comments

Today I paid a visit to the Flock Website, in hopes of checking up on how the little jack-of-all-networks browser’s development was coming along. The page that met my eyes left me in a state of puzzlement, shock and disbelief. I was half hoping that it was all some sort of elaborate joke, but alas, it’s all real.

It seems as though the powers that be decided that the “boring” old Flock page needed a facelift. What we see here folks is plastic surgery gone horribly, horribly wrong. These surgeons are clearly not qualified to be hacking and slashing at a once-beautiful Web entity.

Flocking Ugly

Thar she blows. The brand new Flock page. What a colossal disaster. And no, the extent of this apparent trainwreck isn’t just skin deep, oh no. The underlying markup looks like it was printed on A4 paper, shredded and pasted back together again.

To refresh our memories, here’s a screencap of the “old” Flock design. Skillfully hand-crafted by Bryan Veloso, it embodies the very essence of simplistic beauty. All that Flock stands… or stood for.

Flock

I, for one, have completely lost faith in the project. I was initially interested in seeing what kind of progress had been made with the browser, but now I just can’t bear to look at the thing.

Flock that!

An Update

After a lengthy conversation with Evan Hamilton, Flock’s Community Ambassador, I’ve made a discovery or two. It turns out that the new Flock design was actually contracted out to an external agency. Flock have since hired an in-house designer, who, according to Evan will be able to properly communicate their visual ambitions. Evan mentioned the difficulties that arise when contracting a design over a large geographical distance, and I fully understand.

I must say, I was very impressed with Evan’s response during our back-and-forth, he was wonderful to chat with, seemed to take notice of my criticism and suggestions, was not offended by this harsh article and just came across as genuine. Consider my faith in the Flock project restored.

This Post Has 8 Responses

  1. Matthew Says:

    I would have to agree with you, although I never had any faith in the project. The few times I tried to run their browser, it would crash out-right. It was not even alpha quality software and now their new design just adds insult to injury.

  2. Evan Hamilton Says:

    Hey Matt,

    Sorry to hear you don’t like the new Flock.com. We love feedback on both the browser and the website, so if you have any specific qualms you’d like to see addressed, shoot them to my address below and we will take them into consideration as we continue to develop our website. Development is always a complicated process, and feedback from folks outside of the company is always super helpful.

    @Matthew: We’ve made significant strides in browser stability for Flock 0.9, and we are based off of the Firefox 2.0 architecture. I think you’ll find the experience much better than older versions, if you give it a try.

    Thanks to both of you for the honest feedback!

    Evan Hamilton
    Flock Community Ambassador
    evan at flock dot com

  3. Alexander Radsby Says:

    I can’t believe that Flock actually did this. Do you know any browser site that have flash in it? I truly loved the previous version.

    The only goodlooking browsersite left is Firefox…

  4. Tayfun Says:

    What a piece of shit!!

    It looks like the result AOL sodomising istockphoto with a bad jpeg compressor.

  5. Jem Says:

    The screenshot doesn’t look so bad, just incredibly cheesy (but then I find anything using random stock models usually is).

    Good to know they’re listening though (re: comment from Evan)

  6. Matthew Clapp Says:

    And I thought I was just crazy. I just couldn’t figure out why they thought they needed a new site. The old one was excellent. Why change it? If I were them, I would ask Bryan to just extend the old design.

    As far as the browser, I like the concept but it going to take a while to get it right. Each time I install it, I uninstall it about 10 minutes later. I do hope the project is successful. It just doesn’t seem to be for me.

  7. A Flock-ed Up Redesign Says:

    [...] looks like Matt of WebRev is more than upset with the recent redesign of the Flock homepage, and with good reason: it’s ugly as hell, and [...]

  8. Charles Says:

    I don’t like Flock, althrough it is Firefox based, i am running Firefox 3 Beta 3


Have Your Say, Leave a Comment